Iowa Casinos & Gambling Forum - Poker, Pari-mutuel

FAQ Search Members Usergroups Inbox Profile Log in Register
Iowa Gambling
Iowa Casinos
Iowa Poker
Iowa Pari-mutuel
Gambling Forum
Iowa Casino Photos
Iowa Casinos News
Iowa Gaming Law
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
lork



Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 18
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 7:18 pm    Post subject: three queens Reply with quote

I don't play much NL-ring online, so I'm welcome to any and all advice on this hand. I won an OK pot, but I don't think I played it well.

1-2 NL, me and the other guy each have about $100 on the table. A few limps, I bring it up to 10 with QQ, one call behind me and one call in front of me. Flop comes Kd-Qd-x, I make a weak lead of 8 into a $34 pot. I wanted the bet to look weak and get a raise. The player in position on me makes it 40. I just call. My thinking is that I wanted the lead to look weak and I have to take into account that this could be the read my opponent got, and I wanted to give him another chance to bluff at it. If he has a hand, he's probably committed at this point and will pay me off. But I think my re-raise would pretty well define what I'm holding and if he's a good player he will be able to fold. And sure, the diamond's are out, but if he happens to hold a flush draw then he's comitted to the pot and isn't folding anyways.

The turn brought a third diamond. I didn't really "feel" like he was on the diamond draw, so this didn't bother me for that reason, but it was still a terrible card. Now I A.) have a hand that I have to protect in case he's holding one diamond and B.) have a board that will make it easy for him to fold.
I led out with $45, which was about all my chips, and he quickly folded.

What do you guys think of this hand? Of course the majority of opinions will probably say I should have pushed in on the flop, and I realize that's the text-book play and probably the better option, but I really wanted $60 more and just didn't feel like I was getting it if I came back over the top. Also, how would you have played the turn assuming the action on the flop stands?
Back to top
arcfinn



Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 11
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You should of bet bigger on the flop. about the size of the pot. The turn you should of checked, let him bet diamonds or a bluff. the river comes a diamond you check fold, of course if it pairs the board you check raise or bet depending on how many chips they have left at this point.
Back to top
DeepBlue



Joined: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 57
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Indeed, the bet on the flop was an amateur call rather than a weak call - 8 into 34 isn't really anything much, at the least have made it 17 or even 34 which is a more pronounced bet. Not overly confident, but it shows a mild belief in your hand.

He would have matched this based on his raise following yours, so you may have made even more out of this hand. There was always a risk at the river with your hand, but that is a strong position to be in.
Back to top
BigAl



Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 23
PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Too weak, far too weak. It was a nice bet to keep people in the hand as it showed little confidence, but I think here it called for something a little more.

I would have stuck to half the pot, at around $17, but that's just my opinion.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT
Quick Reply and Actions
 
 

 

Page 1 of 1


 
 


American Casinos powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group and MX-System. Our partners are:
Las Vegas Casinos, Atlantic City Casinos, Colorado Casinos, California Casinos